Abstract
The term "zero waste" can be somewhat misleading, as it implies an idealization of a concept that may never be achieved in real-world practice. According to Waste360 , "many in the solid waste industry think zero waste is an impossible goal. (Zero-waste advocates) believe just the opposite that a zero-waste approach makes the most economical and environmental sense...Most everyone agrees, however, that actually reaching the point where absolutely no waste is created is unlikely" (Leroux 2001). "Zero waste is a goal. It's completely unachievable...It's not about perfection; it's about making better choices" (Kellogg 2018). The immediate value of moving towards a zero-waste society is not immediately clear, but since the world we live in is finite in its resources, at what point does that value become evident? How do we broaden our value analysis to better incorporate the longer-term view? What are strategies that we can easily incorporate now that will significantly increase that longer term value and mitigate the impacts for future generations? This report considers these questions through a series of case studies from different parts of the U.S. manufacturing sector.
| Original language | American English |
|---|---|
| Number of pages | 240 |
| DOIs | |
| State | Published - 2023 |
NLR Publication Number
- NREL/TP-6A20-80177
Other Report Number
- DOE/EE-2696
Keywords
- circular economy
- sustainable manufacturing
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Sustainable Manufacturing and the Circular Economy: U.S. Department of Energy (DOE), Energy Efficiency & Renewable Energy (EERE)'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver