Abstract
This work evaluates the critical issues surrounding P1, P2, and P3 scribing for semi-transparent perovskite module integration. We find that P1 scribing procedures are well-translated from other thin-film technologies. P2 scribing is best performed with a mechanical scribe, but remains a source of series resistance. P3 scribing is found to cause an increase in scribing dead area and a potential degradation source.
| Original language | American English |
|---|---|
| Pages | 3468-3472 |
| Number of pages | 5 |
| DOIs | |
| State | Published - Jun 2019 |
| Event | 46th IEEE Photovoltaic Specialists Conference, PVSC 2019 - Chicago, United States Duration: 16 Jun 2019 → 21 Jun 2019 |
Conference
| Conference | 46th IEEE Photovoltaic Specialists Conference, PVSC 2019 |
|---|---|
| Country/Territory | United States |
| City | Chicago |
| Period | 16/06/19 → 21/06/19 |
Bibliographical note
Publisher Copyright:© 2019 IEEE.
NLR Publication Number
- NREL/CP-5K00-78459
Keywords
- degradation
- electrodes
- indium tin oxide
- lasers
- nanoparticles
- photovoltaic cells
- substrates
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Evaluating Interconnection Schemes for Semi-Transparent Perovskite Mini-Modules'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver