Abstract
Our group recently developed dual-function materials (DFMs) and reactive carbon capture (RCC) processes for the selective production of methanol (MeOH) or CO, offering two novel and unique pathways for MeOH production. This study conducted a comparative techno-economic analysis (TEA) of the two RCC pathways from exhaust CO2: 1) a “Direct RCC-to-MeOH” pathway and 2) an “Indirect RCC-to-CO” pathway followed by MeOH synthesis. The “Direct RCC-to-MeOH” pathway produced a lower levelized cost of MeOH (LCOM) at $0.78/kg, compared to $0.84/kg for the “Indirect RCC-to-CO” pathway. The key difference is the need to recompress the syngas from RCC before MeOH synthesis in “Indirect RCC-to-CO.” Nonetheless, with reduced catalyst costs and hydrogen requirements for “RCC-to-CO,” this pathway merits further study to produce syngas rather than MeOH. Both pathways are comparable in LCOM to baseline e-MeOH production from CO2 hydrogenation ($0.72/kg) while having lower carbon intensities (0.45 and 0.51 kg-CO2e/kg vs 0.54 kg-CO2e/kg).
| Original language | American English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 20525-20534 |
| Number of pages | 10 |
| Journal | Industrial and Engineering Chemistry Research |
| Volume | 64 |
| Issue number | 43 |
| DOIs | |
| State | Published - 2025 |
NLR Publication Number
- NLR/JA-5700-94218
Keywords
- carbon dioxide
- hydrogen
- life cycle assessment
- methanol
- reactive carbon capture
- syngas
- techno-economic analysis
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Comparative Technoeconomic Analysis and Life Cycle Assessment of Emerging Reactive Carbon Capture-to-Methanol Pathways'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver